argumentative proposal

The topic i will be using is NCAA eligibility for major junior hockey athletes and how the rules and guidelines affect their life.  I narrowed it down because I know solid background information and it would have been to broad to do NCAA eligibility as a whole.  Certain tools that ive used so far is a couple articles on EBSCO but mostly the CHL, USHL, and NCAA websites. Possible tentative thesis would be: Major junior hockey players are affected by NCAA eligibilities rules and guidelines when it comes to injuries, possible income, and education opportunities. Additional things i could look at would be not really case studies but personal interviews or written papers by players that have been affected by this rule.  Other things would be to look at the multiple court cases that have taken place with people breaking the NCAA eligibiltiy rules and their arguments. Other credible sources that could be available are the OHL, WHL, and QMJHL websites because they post many pages trying to pursue major juniors and not go the NCAA route which could be good to look at as a sort of counter argument.